Founding Chair
This instrument defines the office of Founding Chair of the PrepGraph Council for Responsible AI & School Innovation – India, held by Ms. Sri Lakshmi for the inaugural term 2026-27. It states the mandate, the powers withheld, and how each may be checked.
- Office holder
- Ms. Sri Lakshmi
- Term
- Inaugural term 2026–27
- Nature
- Honorary · Non-executive · Unpaid
- Appointed
- 29 August 2026
The Council is being constituted. Its founding cohort is forming and no Council publication, roundtable or research output has yet been produced. Everything described as planned is a commitment of intent, not a record of work done.
PrepGraph Council for Responsible AI & School Innovation – India
Ms. Sri Lakshmi
Founding Chair · Inaugural term 2026–27
The Chair convenes the Council, approves everything published in its name, and may refuse.
The mandate
Mandate of the Founding Chair
The mandate is exercised at the level of the Council, not the company. Where a duty requires the Secretariat to act, it acts on the Chair's written instruction and files the instruction.
These eight duties are the whole of the office. Nothing outside them is asked of the Chair, and nothing inside them may be exercised on her behalf.
-
Duty 1.Set the annual agenda
Decide, with the Council's members, which questions the Council will take up in the year and which it will decline. The agenda is published within thirty days of the first meeting and lists the declined questions alongside the accepted ones.
-
Duty 2.Convene and chair sessions
Call the Council's roundtables and chair them. Notice of at least fourteen days is given with the agenda and the papers. Minutes record disagreement as well as consensus, are drafted by the Secretariat within ten working days and circulated to attendees so that anyone misrecorded can correct it, and the summary of decisions is public within fifteen working days.
-
Duty 3.Approve publications and write their forewords
Publication in the Council's name requires the approval of the Chair and a majority of the voting members under Article 12 of the Charter, and nothing is published while fewer than seven voting members are in office. Her approval is necessary and is not sufficient. Her foreword states what the work establishes and what it does not. She may require changes, delay issue, or refuse issue, and a refusal by her stands without a vote, because a veto needs no majority. For any study involving children the ethics review panel holds a separate veto over publication, which is a power to stop and not a share in the approval.
-
Duty 4.Represent the Council in public
Speak for the Council on its agenda. Public representation is on Council subjects only and is never a representation about a product, a price or a purchase. The words she speaks are hers, whoever prepared the briefing.
-
Duty 5.Appoint the first cohort of Founding Members
Appoint the first cohort of Founding Members, up to twelve, filling the constituencies the Charter names. That is the one appointment the Chair makes alone. Expert Fellows are appointed thereafter by the Founding Members, and every later member appointment requires their assent. The nomination and invitation list is built from public and professional sources and may not be derived from PrepGraph's commercial records; the Reviewer of Concerns tests that annually. Each invitation states that membership is unpaid, that it confers no certification and no procurement access, that the membership list will not be used for solicitation, and quotes the Charter: "Membership of the Council does not constitute endorsement of PrepGraph or any technology vendor. Members participate in their individual professional capacity to advance responsible, ethical and evidence-informed use of AI and innovation in school education."
-
Duty 6.Own the ethics of the research agenda
Approve the ethics commitments under which any Council research involving schools or children proceeds, and confirm in writing, before fieldwork, that each study meets them. The confirmation is dated and published with the study. It records that every researcher and office-holder on the study has been told in writing that the duty to report under section 19 of the POCSO Act 2012 is a personal legal duty which no Council confidentiality undertaking, consent form or agreement may qualify, and it names the Data Fiduciary for the study under the DPDP Act 2023.
-
Duty 7.Hold the Secretariat to the independence policy
Test the Secretariat's conduct against the independence policy at each meeting, require correction where it has drifted, and enter what was found in the register.
If a full year passes with no entry under this duty, the likeliest explanation is not good conduct but an untried test.
-
Duty 8.Decide what the Council will not do
Refuse work that falls outside the six pillars, that cannot be done honestly in the time available, or that would place the Council near a procurement decision. Refusals are published with the agenda.
A small body of credible work is the objective. Volume is not.
The check on the convener
Independence, and how it is enforced
The Council carries its convener's name. A forum funded and staffed by a company should say so on the first line rather than be found out on the tenth. Naming the convener does not settle the question of independence; it raises it.
The Council's position on vendors is fixed and is quoted in full wherever it is relevant: "The Council does not endorse individual procurement decisions or technology vendors. Its role is to advance responsible AI readiness, educator capability and evidence-based innovation in schools."
The convener is now a named person: Umesh Sharma, Founder & CEO, PrepGraph, holding the Secretariat office of Founder & Executive Convener. Naming him sharpens the question of independence rather than settling it, so the rule that binds the office is set down in the same place: "The Executive Convener may contribute research, evidence and proposals. Council recommendations are determined collectively and are not subject to commercial approval by PrepGraph."
Each safeguard below is drafted so that it can be used against the convener's wishes and so that it survives the end of this framework. Where a clause would otherwise depend on goodwill, the operative words are the deadline, the licence or the waiver.
The one thing PrepGraph sees before publication
PrepGraph has no editorial review. It receives one written factual-accuracy pass, limited to statements about its own systems, of ten working days. Silence publishes. Every comment it makes and every change that follows is logged and published with the output. It cannot delay, amend or withhold anything.
The funder does see a draft. Saying otherwise would be simpler and would be false. What it cannot do is decide anything about the draft, and the published log of its comments is how a reader checks that rather than takes it on trust.
What the named offices cannot do
The three Secretariat offices are held by people employed by PrepGraph: the Founder & Executive Convener, Umesh Sharma, who is Founder and Chief Executive of PrepGraph; the Executive Director & Secretary-General, Rekha Sharma, who is its Chief Operating Officer; and the Director, Education Partnerships & National Outreach, Anisha Sarkar. None of the three holds a vote and none counts towards quorum. The Executive Convener cannot approve, amend, delay or withhold anything the Chair has approved; cannot remove her, shorten her term, or appoint her successor once the Council has voting members; does not sit on the ethics review panel; and is not present when the Council decides any matter in which PrepGraph has an interest, the minutes recording that he withdrew. He may propose an agenda item and the Chair may decline it without giving a reason. Every proposal he makes is minuted with its source named, so that a reader of the minutes can see which items came from the funder and what happened to them.
Before the first Founding Members accept, the protection against removal is thinner than it reads. No person and no body can remove the Chair, and a successor may be nominated by PrepGraph subject only to the written concurrence of the Reviewer of Concerns. That is set out in full under succession, and naming who at PrepGraph would do the nominating does not improve it.
Approved text is issued unchanged
Once a publication is approved under Article 12 of the Charter, the Secretariat's role is production and distribution. It may not amend, delay or decline the approved text, and must issue it within ten working days. If it does not, the Chair may publish that text herself in the Council's name; PrepGraph grants an irrevocable, royalty-free licence for that purpose, surviving the end of her term and of this framework.
A publication criticising the Secretariat's conduct or PrepGraph's product runs on the same ten working days as any other.
The register of decisions
A dated, numbered register records every agenda and publication decision: what was proposed, by whom, what was approved, what was changed, and at whose instance. Entry 1 is the adoption of this instrument. The Chair may inspect it at any time; a member receives a copy within five working days of asking; a summary is published each quarter.
The right to say that something was resisted
If the Secretariat obstructs, delays or dilutes an approved output, the Chair may say so publicly, in her own words, without prior clearance. No confidentiality obligation in this framework or in any other document between her and PrepGraph applies to the conduct of the Council, and PrepGraph waives any claim arising from such a statement. The waiver survives the term.
Funding fixed before the work
The Council's budget for the term is stated in writing before the first meeting and held for the term. It may not be reduced, withheld or made conditional on the content of a finding. Any change, withdrawal included, requires ninety days' written notice with reasons — the Charter's period, and the only one — entered in the register, notified to members, and publishable by the Chair. Sustained failure by the Secretariat to convene, circulate or publish for ninety days is deemed a withdrawal and starts the same clock and the same duty to publish.
The money is not segregated. The Council holds no bank account and the Chair does not commit PrepGraph's funds, so every disbursement remains a PrepGraph decision. The undertaking that funding is not released output by output is therefore a stated intention backed by notice and disclosure, not by a separate account, and should be read as that and no more.
Separation from commerce
No Council session, publication or membership list is used as a sales channel. Council contact details are held apart from PrepGraph's commercial systems and are not transferred into them. Session attendance is recorded with each attendee's employer. Nothing said, seen or collected in a Council room is put to commercial use by PrepGraph, and that includes product development, roadmap, pricing and competitive analysis. The annual public record answers this as a yes or no question, and names who answered it.
If a participating school asks about PrepGraph's product, the conversation happens outside the Council, is handled by the commercial function, and is not recorded as Council activity.
The standing question
Each meeting opens with one recorded question: has anything been asked of the Council since the last meeting that served the convener rather than schools. The answer, the name of the person answering, and any instance disclosed are minuted, and an instance becomes a numbered register entry.
No success-linked payment
Neither the Chair nor any Council member receives payment or benefit linked to PrepGraph's sales, pipeline, referrals, school sign-ups or valuation. The annual public record states what the Council cost and what, if anything, anyone was paid.
Who actually drafted it
Every Council output names its drafter and that person's employer on its first page, alongside its funder, the amount attributable to the work where it can be stated, and its reviewers with their declared interests. At least one instrument each term is drafted by a person not employed by PrepGraph, and the annual public record states whether that was achieved. Where a generative AI system was used in drafting, in analysis, or in handling participant data, the output names the system and says what it was used for.
A body writing rules about AI in schools discloses its own use of it first. The drafter line exists because most of this corpus was drafted by the funder's staff, and a reader should be able to see that on the page rather than infer it.
Not yet operative
A control the Chair cannot switch off
Every safeguard above fails if a Chair declines to use it. Once members are appointed, any member may enter a dissent of up to three hundred words in the register and require it to be published alongside the output it concerns, unedited except for length and law, without the Chair's approval or the Secretariat's.
Until the first members accept, this control does not exist. The Council should not be treated as independently checked before that date.
The office of the Founding Chair
The PrepGraph Council for Responsible AI & School Innovation is a national forum advancing responsible, research-led AI innovation in Indian schools. Its mission is stated in one sentence and is not open to local reinterpretation: "To help build an Indian education system strengthened by responsible, research-led AI innovation — preparing students, teachers and institutions for an AI-enabled future by advancing responsible adoption, educator capability, academic innovation, student safety, research evidence and ethical governance."
Ms. Sri Lakshmi holds the office of Founding Chair for the inaugural term 2026-27, commencing on her acceptance on 29 August 2026. PrepGraph is the founding organisation, research and knowledge partner, and secretariat. The Secretariat schedules, drafts, records and corresponds. It does not decide.
The Secretariat is no longer anonymous, and the Chair's counterparts in it are named. Umesh Sharma, Founder and Chief Executive of PrepGraph, holds the Secretariat office of Founder & Executive Convener. Rekha Sharma, Chief Operating Officer of PrepGraph, holds the office of Executive Director & Secretary-General. Anisha Sarkar holds the office of Director, Education Partnerships & National Outreach, work that is commercially adjacent at PrepGraph and is fenced for that reason. All three are employed by the funder. None of them holds a vote on anything — not on publication, not on standards, not on membership, not on a vendor question — and none counts towards quorum, so the Council is never quorate on the strength of its Secretariat.
That is three named officers of the company that pays for this Council against one Chair who is not employed by it, with no independent member yet in office. The imbalance is stated here rather than left to be discovered, and naming the three officers does not give the Council members, activities, publications or findings it does not have. The rule separating the two bodies is quoted, never paraphrased, wherever they are described together: "The Council determines the recommendations and principles. The PrepGraph-supported Secretariat enables research, coordination, publication and implementation. The Secretariat holds no vote."
The Charter governs. This instrument is subordinate to it and is void to the extent of any inconsistency with it. The Chair does not hold the Council's authority alone. The voting members are the Founding Chair and the Founding Members, and the Charter's principal decisions — what is published, whether the Chair is removed, whether an Article is amended — are taken by them collectively. Where this instrument describes a power of the Chair, it is a power exercised inside that body, not above it.
On the date this instrument is issued the Council has no members, no completed activities, no publications and no findings. Everything set out here is either a rule that takes effect on acceptance or a plan for the inaugural term.
The distinctions below separate this office from an advisory seat. Each leaves a trace in the register of decisions described further on, so that a reader can test whether the distinction held rather than accept that it was claimed.
Whose agenda
An adviser responds to an agenda set by the company. The Chair sets the Council's annual agenda with its members. The Secretariat may propose items; it may not decide them. Every agenda item is entered in the register with the name of the person who proposed it.
Who chairs the room
The Chair convenes each session, fixes the question it will address, and approves the invitation list. Attendance is minuted by name, role and employer, so that the composition of any Council room can be examined afterwards.
Whose name is on the record
A Council publication is approved by the Chair together with a majority of the voting members, under Article 12 of the Charter, and carries her dated written approval and her foreword. Nothing is published in the Council's name while fewer than seven voting members are in office. Anything issued without that approval is not a Council publication, and the Secretariat must say so when asked.
Who may say no
The Chair may refuse a publication, withdraw the Council's name from an activity, and require the Secretariat to correct a public statement within five working days. Each refusal and each correction is a register entry.
Direction of accountability
An adviser is accountable to the company that appointed her. The Chair is accountable to the Council's stated purpose and holds the Secretariat to it.
The wording is not the test. The test is whether the first year's register shows the Chair refusing anything at all.
The research agenda and its ethics commitments
The Council intends to build an Indian evidence base on what AI actually does to learning. That is the sixth pillar and the one most easily corrupted, because the convener sells a product in the field to be studied.
PrepGraph may participate in Council research as a data or platform partner. Where it does, the participation is disclosed on the first page of the study and not in a footnote. Product evidence generated by PrepGraph is never presented as an independent finding of the Council. Where PrepGraph influenced a study's design, the study states how and names who.
One study the Council will not publish at all: an evaluation of a PrepGraph product funded by PrepGraph. Where the intervention studied is the convener's product, the study is an evaluation of that product whatever it is titled, and the protocol names which product delivered the intervention. The disclosure rules below apply to the case the Charter does contemplate, which is an independently funded study in which PrepGraph supplied data or platform access.
No study begins without the Chair's dated written confirmation that it meets the commitments below, and that confirmation is published with the study.
Children first
Research involving children proceeds only with informed school and guardian consent, an opt-out that carries no penalty of any kind, including no effect on any commercial relationship the school has with PrepGraph, and the minimum personal data the question requires, deleted on a date stated in advance.
Questions and methods fixed in advance
The question, the method, the primary measure and the analysis are recorded and dated before data collection begins, and published with the study. Any departure from that record is listed in the study, so that a disappointing result cannot later be reframed as a different one.
Negative results are published
A study finding no effect, or an adverse effect, is published within ninety days of completion, on the same terms as one finding a benefit. The Chair may direct publication if it is not offered.
This commitment is worth nothing until a study that embarrasses the convener has actually been published. Until then it is an intention, not a record.
Disclosure of the convener's role
Every publication states who funded the work, the amount attributable to it where it can be stated, who collected the data, whose platform was studied, who drafted it, who reviewed it, and who at PrepGraph saw the draft in the factual-accuracy pass, on what date, what was said, and whether any change followed. That pass is the only sight of a draft the funder gets: no editorial review, one written pass limited to statements about its own systems, ten working days, silence publishes, and no power to delay, amend or withhold.
Participating schools see it first
Schools that took part receive the findings at least seven days before publication. They may correct factual descriptions of themselves. They may not alter the findings, and the study says so.
Open publication
Council research is published in full, with method and limitations, free to read and without registration or email capture, so that reading it does not generate a sales lead.
Support provided to the office, and its limits
PrepGraph provides the support below so that Council work meets a standard the Chair is willing to sign. It is support to the office, not a benefit to the person. Assets created under it belong to the Council and are withdrawn at the end of the term.
The support is delivered by the three named offices of the Secretariat, and the direction of that relationship is fixed: the Secretariat serves the Chair. It drafts, convenes and records on her written instruction, and files the instruction with the record, so that a reader can afterwards see who asked for what. The three officers are salaried executives of the company that funds the Council and the Chair is not, which is precisely why the instruction is written down and filed. This is a service provided to the office. It is not supervision of it, and the Secretariat holds no vote on anything the office decides.
Nothing in this section obliges the Chair to appear anywhere. Every item may be declined, at any time, without a reason.
Council profile
A profile carrying her designation, biography and approved photograph, published alongside the Council's purpose, its non-statutory status, and the summary of her declared interests.
Briefing before any appearance
Identification of relevant platforms, and, before each appearance, a written note setting out the current state of the question and what the Council can and cannot claim about it.
Editorial support
Research and drafting assistance for Council publications, forewords, articles and interviews on Council subjects. Nothing attributed to her is issued without her written approval of the final text, and approval of a draft is not approval of a later version. Whoever drafted is named on the output, together with their employer, whether or not that employer is PrepGraph.
Session materials
Invitations, agendas and session papers for Council activities, circulated with at least fourteen days' notice, and minutes drafted within ten working days and issued to attendees, with the summary of decisions public within fifteen working days.
Travel and logistics
Travel, local transport and reasonable lodging for engagements agreed in advance, arranged and paid by the Secretariat so that no cost of the office falls on the Chair, and recorded separately from any question of remuneration.
A named coordinator
The Secretariat office accountable for scheduling, records and follow-through is the Executive Director & Secretary-General, Rekha Sharma, who may name one further person to carry the day-to-day work. Both are named in writing and reachable at [email protected]. If either changes, the Chair is told before the change takes effect.
On whose instruction
The Secretariat drafts, convenes and records on the Chair's written instruction, and the instruction is filed with the record it produced. Where it has acted without one, the record says so. Instructions are Council records and are provided to the Chair on request on the same terms as minutes and registers.
The filing is the whole of the safeguard. An unfiled understanding between an unpaid Chair and a full-time secretariat is indistinguishable, a year later, from the secretariat having decided.
What the support does not extend to
Support is confined to Council business. The Secretariat does not build a personal profile for the Chair, place her in media unrelated to the Council's agenda, or draft material issued under her name on subjects outside the six pillars.
Terms of engagement
The engagement is honorary and non-executive. It creates no employment, agency or partnership, and no office of PrepGraph. The Chair leads the Council; she does not join the company.
The term is twelve months, commencing on her acceptance on 29 August 2026 and expiring on 29 August 2027. Whether the office continues beyond that date is decided by the voting members, from nominations; PrepGraph holds no vote and no veto over it. The Chair's own written agreement is required as well, before the term ends. Silence does not renew it, and if no voting member is in office when the term expires, the term expires and the vacancy provisions below apply.
Time, honestly estimated
Roughly four to six hours a month, plus events agreed in advance. The Secretariat logs the hours actually asked of the Chair and reports the total in the annual public record, set beside the paid person-days the Secretariat spent on Council work in the same period.
The two figures are printed together because the ratio is the honest measure of this office. An unpaid Chair of a few dozen hours a year, reviewing work drafted by a funded full-time staff, is review at that ratio, and no wording in this instrument changes it. If the actual load exceeds the estimate, the correct remedy is a smaller programme, not a revised estimate. The Chair decides which activities go.
What the hours contain
One agenda and review call with the Secretariat each month, reading and approving drafts, preparing and chairing sessions, correspondence with members she has invited, and the ethics confirmations.
Events
Each appearance is agreed individually. There is no standing commitment to a number of events, no minimum and no target.
Renewal and amendment
Continuation beyond the term is decided by the voting members and requires the Chair's written agreement; PrepGraph holds no vote and no veto over it. This instrument may not be amended during the term without the Chair's written agreement, and any amendment is entered in the register with its date and reason. It may not be amended so as to conflict with the Charter, and an amendment that does is void to the extent of the conflict.
Records
Minutes, registers and Council correspondence are Council records held by the Secretariat. Copies are provided to the Chair within ten working days of a request, during the term and after it.
Confidentiality, bounded
Confidentiality covers PrepGraph's commercial information and the personal data of participants. It does not extend to the Council's conduct, its findings, or the Chair's own account of either.
Compensation
There is no compensation for the office. The Chair receives no fee, salary, retainer, equity, commission, referral payment or success-linked benefit of any kind for holding it. An unpaid Chair is harder to direct, which is the point of the constraint.
The annual public record states that nothing was paid, so that the claim can be checked rather than merely repeated. Two things sit outside the rule, and both are handled in writing.
Expenses
Actual and reasonable expenses for Council engagements, agreed in advance and either paid directly by the Secretariat or reimbursed against receipts. Expenses are not remuneration and are recorded separately.
Specific engagements
A discrete piece of work outside the mandate, such as a commissioned paper or a keynote requested by a third party, may carry an honorarium. It may not be paid by PrepGraph or by any party with a commercial interest in the Council's work, is agreed in a separate written engagement stating the deliverable and the sum before work begins, and is disclosed wherever the engagement is public.
What may never be paid
No payment, during this term or afterwards, may be linked directly or indirectly to PrepGraph's revenue, pipeline, referrals, school sign-ups or valuation.
If such an offer is made, the correct response is to decline it and to enter in the register that it was made.
Powers the Chair does not hold
The office is bounded. The Chair's authority runs over the Council. It does not run over the company, and it does not run over any school's decisions.
If any person represents otherwise, in a meeting, a proposal or a public statement, the Secretariat corrects it in writing within five working days and records the correction in the register.
No power to publish alone
She cannot issue a Council publication on her own authority. Approval requires her and a majority of the voting members, and nothing is published in the Council's name while fewer than seven voting members are in office. Her power over publication is the power to stop, not the power to release.
Several earlier descriptions of this office said that she alone approves what is published. That was wrong and the Charter does not permit it.
No power to choose her successor
She does not appoint, nominate or approve the next Chair, and neither does PrepGraph once voting members are in office. The succession rules below are not hers to vary.
No authority to bind PrepGraph
She is not a director, employee, officer, shareholder or authorised signatory of PrepGraph, and may not act or be described as one.
No signing authority
She does not sign contracts, proposals, orders, tenders or letters of intent for PrepGraph or for any school.
No commercial representations
She does not quote prices, discounts, commercial terms or delivery commitments, and is not asked to.
No commitment of funds
She does not commit PrepGraph's funds. The Council's budget is proposed by the Secretariat and borne by PrepGraph. Her power over it is the power to refuse an activity, not to spend.
No certification, rating or approval
The Council does not certify, rate or approve schools, curricula or products, and the Chair therefore holds no such power to lend, in this term or in any future arrangement.
No procurement role
She does not recommend, shortlist, introduce or influence any purchase, by any school, of PrepGraph's product or any other.
A request that she do so is a breach of this framework by the person making it, whoever they are, and is recorded as one.
No data authority
She has no access to and no control over student personal data, and requires none for the office.
Safeguards the Chair is owed
These are obligations on PrepGraph, exercisable by the Chair. Those marked as surviving continue to bind PrepGraph after the term ends and after this framework ceases to have effect.
No obligation to endorse
She is never required to make, repeat or approve a claim about any product, including PrepGraph's, that she does not independently hold to be true.
No obligation to open doors
She is never asked to influence a procurement decision, arrange a commercial introduction, or make an approach on PrepGraph's behalf. She may decline without giving a reason.
Approval over her name and image
No use of her name, designation, photograph, likeness, voice or words in any publication, advertisement, presentation, proposal or channel without her written approval of that specific use. Approval of one use is never approval of another. This obligation survives the term.
The right to decline
Any appearance, interview, quotation or association may be declined at any time, including after acceptance, and without explanation.
No fundraising or solicitation
She is not asked to raise investment, solicit customers, or lend the office to a commercial pitch.
No student personal data
No access to identifiable student data is required of her, and none is routed to her.
Defence of the office
If the Council's administration is criticised publicly, PrepGraph answers for it in its own name, within five working days. The Chair is not asked to defend the Secretariat's conduct.
A clean exit
Within fourteen days of the end of the term her name, photograph and designation are removed from live channels, and the Secretariat confirms in writing where they appeared and that each has been removed.
Publications already issued keep her foreword, marked with the term she held. The record is not rewritten in either direction.
The Chair's own conflict obligations
Independence is tested in both directions. The Chair makes a written declaration of interests before she first sits, refreshes it annually, and notifies any material change within fourteen days.
The declaration is received, held and published by the Reviewer of Concerns, not by the Secretariat, which sees no competitor-relationship data at all. It is published in full alongside her Council profile on the day the appointment takes effect, and an appointment that is not so published is not effective. A body that asks schools to disclose discloses first, and it does not ask the funder's own employees to keep the register.
What is declared
School, trust and board positions; directorships and shareholdings; paid advisory or speaking arrangements in education technology; family interests in any of the above; and any engagement with a school likely to appear in Council work. A person who is an employee, director, shareholder or paid adviser of any supplier of AI products to schools, or who otherwise derives material income from one, may not hold office as Chair, Founding Member or Expert Fellow and may not vote. Vendor staff may be heard as invited Observers only. PrepGraph is a supplier of AI products to schools and is inside that bar, not outside it.
Recusal
She withdraws from any Council decision, session or publication touching a declared interest. The recusal, and who took the decision in her place, are minuted.
The office is not a lever
The office is not used in her own institutional or commercial negotiations, and is not cited in support of any organisation other than the Council.
Third-party payments disclosed
Any honorarium or hospitality received from a third party for an appearance made as Chair is disclosed to the Secretariat within fourteen days and recorded.
Gifts
Gifts of more than token value, from any party with an interest in the Council's work, are declined, and the offer is recorded.
Resignation, vacancy and succession
She may resign at any time, in writing, with or without reason. Thirty days' notice allows commitments to be handed over, but immediate resignation is permitted and will not be contested.
The office may also end without her consent, and the rule for that is the Charter's and no other. It is set out below because a published document that told the press the term could not be shortened would be misstating the constitution.
The office is small enough that its vacancy must be visible. The Council does not continue to speak in a Chair's name once she has left it.
Removal
PrepGraph cannot remove the Chair and cannot end her term early. Removal is by two thirds of the voting members other than the Chair, on grounds stated in writing, put to her with an opportunity to answer before the vote is taken. The grounds, the vote and her answer are entered in the register and published.
This power does not exist until voting members are in office. Until then no person and no body can remove the Chair, which is a real gap and is stated here rather than left to be discovered.
When the office is vacated automatically
The office is vacated without a vote on death, on written medical incapacity certified by a registered medical practitioner, or on failure to discharge the duties of the office for ninety consecutive days without leave recorded in the register. The Secretariat records the date and publishes it within seven days. While no voting member is in office, the vacation is certified by the Reviewer of Concerns and published with the certificate.
Announcement
The Secretariat announces the resignation within seven days, plainly and without characterising her reasons. If she supplies a statement, it is published unedited alongside the announcement.
Her account is hers
She may state her reasons publicly at any time. No confidentiality obligation in this framework prevents her from describing the Council's conduct or her own, and PrepGraph waives any claim arising from that account.
Withdrawal of name
Her name, designation and photograph are removed from live channels within fourteen days. Issued publications retain her foreword with her term dates.
What the Council may do while vacant
The Secretariat may issue administrative notices only. It may not publish substantive positions, convene sessions in the Council's name, or invite members, until a successor has accepted. The vacancy is stated on the Council's public page for as long as it lasts, with its start date, so that its length is visible.
A vacancy before the first cohort exists can only be ended by a nomination from PrepGraph that the Reviewer of Concerns concurs in. Until it is ended the Council does nothing. That is an indefinite freeze the funder is one of only two parties able to lift, and it is the weakest joint in this instrument.
Succession
Once voting members are in office, they elect the successor at their next meeting. PrepGraph takes no part in that election and proposes no candidate. Before the first cohort exists there is nobody to elect, and the rule for that case is narrow: PrepGraph may nominate, but the appointment takes effect only on the written concurrence of the Reviewer of Concerns, and the nomination, the concurrence and the nominee's declared interests are published before the successor takes office. An appointment not so published is not effective.
This is the most consequential act in the whole structure, and before the cohort exists the funder has a hand in it. The concurrence of an independent person, and the publication of all three documents on the same day, is the entire check on that hand. It holds only for as long as a Reviewer is willing to withhold concurrence.
Commitments in flight
Engagements already accepted may be honoured, transferred or cancelled at her election.
What the role will demand, and what could go wrong
The office is not ceremonial and should not be accepted as though it were.
The demands are ordinary and persistent. Drafts read on time. Members invited personally, most of whom will not reply at once. Sessions chaired well enough that senior people return. Requests declined, some of them from the Secretariat. Little of this is visible from outside, and the visible part is the smallest part.
One demand is structural rather than practical, and it should be read before the office is accepted. She will be chairing a body whose secretariat is three executives of the company that funds it: its Founder and Chief Executive, its Chief Operating Officer, and its Director of Education Partnerships. Until the first Founding Members accept, she is the only person around this office who is not employed by that company. None of the three votes, none counts towards quorum, and every power that answers the arrangement is written down above. Whether the office is real is therefore not a question about the drafting. It is a question about use, and the first year's register is where it is settled.
The risks below are real. Each has a control. If a control fails, the response is to use the powers in this framework, and if those prove insufficient, to resign and say why.
Being read as a front
The Council carries a company's name. Some readers will assume the Chair is decoration for a sales effort, and a few will say so publicly.
The only answer that works is a record: the published register summaries, the forewords, and at least one instance in which the Council said something the convener disliked. Until that instance exists, the assumption is not unreasonable.
Deference to a full-time secretariat
An unpaid Chair of a few hours a month reviews work drafted by three salaried executives of the funder. Nothing improper need be asked of her for the arrangement to tell: the papers simply arrive finished, on time, and in the Secretariat's own framing of the question.
The first year's test is whether she uses the powers that are written down. They exist and they are printed above; a power to refuse leaves no trace until it is used. The evidence is the register: agenda items declined, a publication refused or held, a correction required within five working days, an instance of pressure from the Secretariat recorded and its resolution stated. A register showing none of these at the end of the term should be read as an untried office rather than a well-conducted one.
A Council that never publishes
The likeliest failure is not scandal but drift. Meetings held, nothing issued, a year gone.
If nothing publishable is ready by the end of the term, the Chair should say so in the annual public record rather than issue something thin.
Being used as a door-opener
Someone will eventually treat an introduction from the Chair as a commercial asset.
The request is declined and recorded in the register. A second recorded instance is stated grounds for resignation, and this framework says so in advance so that it need not be argued later.
Association with a bad outcome
If a child is harmed in a badly governed deployment, any body that spoke about responsible AI will be asked where it was.
The only protection is having published specific, dated guidance that a school could actually have followed, and being able to show the date.
Time, underestimated
Four to six hours a month is honest for a steady month and wrong for a session or publication month.
The logged hours in the annual public record, printed beside the Secretariat's person-days, will show which it was. The remedy is fewer activities, not longer hours.
Questions at her own institution
Colleagues, boards and peers may ask why she lends her standing to a company's forum.
The declaration of interests, the absence of any payment, and this framework are the answer, and all three are published before the question is likely to be asked.
The convener changes
A company's priorities, funding or leadership can change within twelve months.
Her protection is that the publication licence, the confidentiality waiver and the right to state her reasons survive this framework and do not depend on who runs PrepGraph.
How the first year will be judged
Success for this office is institutional quality. Commercial outcomes for PrepGraph are not a measure of the Chair's work, are not reported to her, and are not discussed with her as though they were.
The measures below are proposed for the inaugural term. They are to be confirmed, amended or replaced by the Chair with the Council at its first meeting, and whichever set is adopted is published. The annual public record reports each measure as met or not met, by name.
A published agenda
The Council's agenda for the year, set with its members and published within thirty days of the first meeting, including the questions declined.
Members who can say what they did
A founding membership of up to twelve, drawn across the constituencies the Charter names, each of whom can name a specific contribution. Number is not the measure. A large nominal list is a failure, not a result.
Work a school could use on a Monday
At least one output a principal who buys nothing can apply directly: a governance checklist, a question set for reviewing a vendor, or a policy template, published free and without registration.
Evidence handled honestly
Any research issued states its method, its limitations and its funding, and would survive review by a reader hostile to its conclusion.
The independence record
A complete register, its quarterly summaries published, with any instance of pressure from the Secretariat recorded and its resolution stated.
Interests on the record
Declarations complete for the Chair and every Founding Member, published by the Reviewer of Concerns on the day each appointment takes effect and updated within fourteen days of any change.
Nothing sold in the Council's name
No procurement recommendation, no shortlist, no endorsement, and no use of Council contacts for solicitation.
A single instance is a failure of the year, not an exception to it.
An honest annual public record
The Charter's annual public record, published within ninety days of the end of the term. The term expires on 29 August 2027, so the record is due by 27 November 2027. It states what the Council did, what it failed to do, what it cost, and what it learnt. There is one such document, under one name, with one deadline; any other name or date, in any other instrument, is wrong.
The failure column is not optional, and a statement without one should be read as incomplete.
On the record
Nothing in this instrument has been tested yet; the first test will be the day the Council publishes something its convener would rather it did not.
Public representation
Subjects the Council is convened to address
These are the Council's six pillars, in their canonical order, expressed as the questions a school actually faces. The Chair speaks on them because they are the Council's agenda, not as a personal repertoire.
Nothing in this section describes an appearance that has taken place or a position the Council has reached. The public programme for 2026-27 has not been set, and will be set by the Chair with the Council's members.
Responsible AI in Schools
What a school should establish before approving any AI tool: what data leaves the campus, who reviewed the tool for age-appropriateness, where a human stays in the loop, and how academic integrity is handled in practice rather than in policy.
Framed against obligations schools already carry, such as the DPDP Act 2023. Referring to a statute is not a claim of endorsement by anyone, and the Council has no standing under any of them.
Teacher AI Enablement
What teachers need in order to use AI well: what it is reasonable to ask a teacher to learn in one term, which tasks it can honestly reduce, and how augmentation is distinguished from quiet replacement.
Student AI Readiness
What responsible student use looks like beyond prompting a chatbot: verification, attribution, judgement about when not to use it, and boundaries appropriate to age.
Academic Innovation
Where personalised learning, learning-gap identification and formative assessment genuinely help, where they overpromise, and how differentiated teaching survives contact with a class of sixty.
School Leadership & Governance
What a school should adopt, what it should reject, which policies it needs in place before adoption, and how outcomes should be measured so that the measure survives scrutiny.
Research & Evidence
What the Indian evidence base does and does not yet show, what an honest school-level study looks like, and the ethics of research where children are involved.
The Council's own conduct
Why the Council carries its convener's name, which independence controls it operates under, and what a school should ask of any body that convenes it, this one included.
This subject is on the agenda deliberately. A body that cannot answer it in public should not be asking schools to trust it.
What happens next
Most of these controls begin working the day the first members accept.
Until then the duties here rest with the Chair alone and the member-held checks do not operate. Founding membership is unpaid, confers no certification and no procurement access, and the membership list will not be used for solicitation.