The register

Publications & instruments


This page lists everything the Council has adopted and everything it has promised, with a status against each, so that a reader can hold it to its word.

Adopted instruments
8
Promised outputs
7
Findings published
None
Status report due
31 August 2027
Status

The Council is being constituted. Its founding cohort is forming and no Council publication, roundtable or research output has yet been produced. Everything described as planned is a commitment of intent, not a record of work done.

What exists

Adopted instruments

Eight documents exist as adopted text. Each was approved by the Founding Chair on 29 August 2026, the date of her acceptance, and each can be read here in full, without a form.

What adoption does not mean

None of these instruments has yet been read, corrected or dissented from by a member, because the Council has no members. They carry the authority of their reasoning and of the Chair's approval, and nothing else.

The six founding instruments

The documents the Council asks to be judged on.

01 Constitution Adopted

Founding Charter

Founding Charter of the PrepGraph Council for Responsible AI & School Innovation – India

It constitutes the Council, states what it may and may not do, and fixes the controls that hold its convener and funder, PrepGraph, away from its findings.

17 articles · Adopted 29 August 2026

Read the Founding Charter
02 Principles for adoption Adopted

Responsible AI Principles

Responsible AI Principles for Indian Schools

Founding draft.

10 principles · Adopted 29 August 2026

Read the Principles in full
03 Self-assessment Adopted

School AI Readiness Framework

The School AI Readiness Framework is a self-assessment. It is not an audit, not an application, and not a submission to anybody.

8 domains · 4 levels · Adopted 29 August 2026

Read the Framework in full
04 Research instrument Adopted No study begun

Research Agenda & Ethics

Research Agenda and Ethics Framework

It sets the questions proposed for 2026-28, the evidence tiers every output must be labelled against, the rules binding any study involving children, and the controls on the convener.

9 sections · Adopted 29 August 2026

Read the Research Agenda
05 Policy Adopted

Independence & Conflict Policy

Independence, Ethics and Conflict-of-Interest Policy

It states the conflict — PrepGraph funds the Council, owns its name, and now names three of its own officers to its Secretariat — sets rules specific enough that a breach would leave a trace, and names who may challenge one, including against a named officer.

16 sections · Adopted 29 August 2026

Read the independence policy
06 Terms of participation Adopted No members

Founding Membership

Founding Membership and Terms of Participation

Who may join the Council in its inaugural term, on what terms, and what membership cannot be used for.

13 sections · Adopted 29 August 2026

Read the membership terms

Two further published documents

The programme the Council has committed to, and the office that approves everything above.

07 Programme Adopted No activity held

Programme Calendar 2026–27

Inaugural Term Programme Calendar 2026-27

This is the proposed programme for the inaugural term of the PrepGraph Council for Responsible AI & School Innovation, September 2026 to August 2027, in four quarters.

4 quarters · 23 activities · Adopted 29 August 2026

Read the programme calendar
08 Office Adopted

Office of the Founding Chair

Founding Chair: Mandate, Limits and Safeguards

It states the mandate, the powers withheld, and how each may be checked.

14 sections · Adopted 29 August 2026

Read the Chair’s mandate

What does not exist yet

Planned outputs

None of the following exists. Eight instruments do: the Charter, the Independence Policy, the Membership Terms, the Office of the Founding Chair, the Responsible AI Principles, the School AI Readiness Framework, the Research Agenda and Ethics, and the Programme Calendar are all issued today as founding drafts under Article 17 of the Charter, open for comment and to be reaffirmed, amended or withdrawn by the voting members once seven are in office. They are listed, with that status against each, on the register of publications rather than here. What follows is the work that has not been written. Each is a first-term intention, set down so that it can be held against the Council when the term ends. Drafts will be circulated to members for correction and dissent before publication, and finished instruments will be published free to any school, whether or not it has any connection to the Council, in a form meant to be edited by the school rather than adopted unchanged.

  1. 01

    Model responsible AI use policy

    A school policy in adoptable form: permitted use, prohibited use, disclosure of AI assistance in submitted work, staff use, data rules, and a review clause with a date on it. Written to be amended by a school, not signed as it stands.

    Planned. Not yet drafted.

  2. 02

    Vendor question set

    The questions a school should be able to ask before signing anything: where the claim was measured and on whom, what data leaves the school and where it goes, what happens to that data at exit, who is accountable when an output is wrong, and what the tool costs in teacher time as well as in fees. It names no products.

    Planned. Not yet drafted.

  3. 03

    Teacher AI capability framework

    What a teacher should be able to do, described in observable levels, so that a school can plan development and recognise progress instead of counting attendance at a workshop.

    Planned. Not yet drafted.

  4. 04

    Student AI readiness outline

    Age-appropriate expectations for middle and senior school, framed around judgement, verification and academic honesty rather than tool operation.

    Planned. Not yet drafted.

  5. 05

    Parent communication note

    A plain-language note a school can adapt and send home: what the school does with AI, what it does not do, what it asks of families, and whom a parent should contact with a concern.

    Planned. Not yet drafted.

  6. 06

    Annual perspective note

    A discussion paper on AI readiness in Indian schools, distinguishing plainly between what has been observed, what is inferred and what remains unknown. Where it has no evidence, it will say so.

    Planned for the end of the inaugural term.

  7. 07

    Roundtable notes

    A small number of closed-door roundtables for school leaders, with a public note of what was concluded, and public sessions in which drafts are argued rather than presented.

    Planned. None held to date.

Delivered to date None of 7

Terms of publication

How the Council publishes

Everything on this register is published in full at a public address, free, to any school, whether or not it has any connection to the Council. There is no form and no registration gate, and no record is kept of who reads or downloads a document. Every instrument is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, so a school may amend one, and may remove the Council's name from it, without asking permission. Corrections appear as new versions with the change noted, and earlier versions stay available.

Undertaking

On or before 31 August 2027 the Council will publish a single page listing each item below with one of three statuses: published, in draft, or abandoned, with the reason. An item that is not delivered will be recorded as not delivered rather than quietly re-scoped or carried forward without comment.

Not published here

The appointment pack prepared for the Founding Chair is a private document between the office-holder and the convener, and is not part of this register. The terms of the office that are public are set out in the instrument at 08.

From the independence policy

Quoted, so that the terms above are not the Council's paraphrase of itself.

  • No gated outputs

    Every Council publication is available in full at a public address without registration, form, email address or account, and is free to reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.

    Anyone can test this in a browser without identifying themselves; failure of the test is itself the evidence.

  • Open by default

    Free, full, public, reusable under CC BY 4.0. No form stands between a school and a Council output.

  • Versioned, not edited away

    Corrections appear as new versions with the change noted; earlier versions stay available and mirrored outside PrepGraph's control.

The full independence and conflict policy

Holding it to the register

A register is only useful if somebody checks it.

Every instrument above can be read in full, argued with, and used without the Council's permission. If something here is claimed more strongly than the evidence allows, or an item is still marked planned after its date has passed, the secretariat should hear about it: [email protected].